Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8226
Author(s): | Lopes, D. Vala, J. Oberlé, D. Drozda-Senkowska, E. |
Date: | 2014 |
Title: | Validation of group decisions: why and when perceived group heterogeneity is relevant |
Volume: | 27 |
Number: | 2 |
Pages: | 35-49 |
ISSN: | 0992-986X |
ISBN: | 9782706122354 |
Keywords: | Everyday knowledge validation Group consensus Group heterogeneity Group participation |
Abstract: | Based on the attributional reformulation of social comparison theory (Goethals &Darley, 1977) and on previous studies (e.g., Lopes, Vala, &Garcia-Marques, 2007), the present research extends our understanding of the role of group consensus and heterogeneity on attribution of validity to group opinions and decisions. One experimental study tested the hypothesis that the effect of group heterogeneity on the validity attributed to group decisions is mediated by the perceived group participation when group consensus is high, but not when group consensus is low. The results support this mediated moderation hypothesis and are discussed in the light of the epis-temic value of heterogeneity and consensus information in group decisions and opinions. |
Peerreviewed: | Sim |
Access type: | Embargoed Access |
Appears in Collections: | CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
publisher_version_ICS_JVala_Validation_ARI.pdf Restricted Access | 392,81 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.