Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36911
Author(s): Pennisi, F.
Lunetti, C.
Barbati, C.
Viviani, L.
D’Amelio, A. C.
Pereira, A. da C.
Correia, T.
Odone, A.
Signorelli, C.
Date: 2026
Title: Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review
Journal title: Public Health Reviews
Volume: 47
Reference: Pennisi, F., Lunetti, C., Barbati, C., Viviani, L., D’Amelio, A. C., Pereira, A. da C., Correia, T., Odone, A., & Signorelli, C. (2026). Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review. Public Health Reviews, 47, Article 1609375. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609375
ISSN: 2107-6952
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.3389/phrs.2026.1609375
Keywords: Canada
Health communication
Immunization programs
Systematic review
United States
Abstract: Objective: Vaccine hesitancy threatens optimal immunization coverage. This review systematically identified and evaluated interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European Region and in North America (United States and Canada). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to 17 January 2024. Eligible studies evaluated interventions targeting vaccine hesitancy. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook, and reporting adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565588). Interventions were categorized as educational, communicational, policy-based, organizational, or digital. Results: A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria. Effective approaches included multicomponent strategies, community engagement, reminder and recall systems, educational campaigns, and legislative measures. Digital interventions yielded promising but heterogeneous results. The effectiveness of interventions was often enhanced when tailored to specific population needs and local contexts. Conclusion: Multifaceted interventions adapted to the sociocultural context appear most effective in reducing vaccine hesitancy in Europe and North America. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine implementation strategies and evaluate long-term impacts.
Peerreviewed: yes
Access type: Open Access
Appears in Collections:CIES-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
article_117843.pdf3,27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.