Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/35359
Autoria: Luz, G. M.
Álvares, C.
Data: 2025
Título próprio: Mediating Bolsonarism on Facebook: Religion, technopolitics and activism in grassroots digital networks
Título da revista: Media, Culture and Society
Volume: N/A
Referência bibliográfica: Luz, G. M., & Álvares, C. (2025). Mediating Bolsonarism on Facebook: Religion, technopolitics and activism in grassroots digital networks. Media, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251385466
ISSN: 0163-4437
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1177/01634437251385466
Palavras-chave: Digital activism
Bolsonarism
Technopolitics
Social media
Religious framing
Grassroots mediation
Digital populism
Resumo: This study examines the intersections of religion and technopolitics in Bolsonarism through an in-depth case study of a prominent digital moderator, Actor 1, who mediated between Jair Bolsonaro’s leadership and grassroots supporters during Brazil’s 2022 electoral period. By employing ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews, Critical Discourse Analysis, and Framing Theory, this research explores a multilayered model of mediation that merges the strategic coordination of programmed campaigns with the emotional authenticity of grassroots spontaneity. Through the strategic exploitation of Facebook’s algorithmic architecture, emotionally resonant content was widely disseminated, creating echo chambers that reinforced ingroup loyalty while excluding dissent. Religious framing was central to these efforts, positioning Bolsonaro as a divinely ordained leader whose political struggles integrated a larger spiritual mission. Actor 1 emerges as a paradigmatic intermediary, whose communicative practices integrate opinion leadership, moral-political curation, religious framing, and strategic activism. Religion plays an important role, positioning Bolsonaro as a divinely ordained leader whose political struggles were embedded in a broader spiritual mission. The study demonstrates how technopolitical strategies, intertwined with religious discourse, were used to adapt to regulatory pressures by casting institutional supervision as censorship. These practices shaped collective identities, sustained ideological cohesion, and rallied supporters within a polarized sociopolitical context.
Arbitragem científica: yes
Acesso: Acesso Aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CIES-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro TamanhoFormato 
article_113232.pdf209,76 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.