Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28665
Author(s): | Oruç, R. Uzelgun, M. Sadek, K. |
Date: | 2023 |
Title: | Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
Journal title: | Informal Logic |
Volume: | 43 |
Number: | 1 |
Pages: | 113 - 137 |
Reference: | Oruç, R., Uzelgun, M., & Sadek, K. (2023). Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent. Informal Logic, 43(1), 113-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v43i1.7073 |
ISSN: | 2293-734X |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.22329/il.v43i1.7073 |
Keywords: | Sequencing Critical moves Values of argumentation Munāẓara Argumentative virtues and vices |
Abstract: | The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms. |
Peerreviewed: | yes |
Access type: | Open Access |
Appears in Collections: | CIES-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
article_95525.pdf | 324,76 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.