Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27797
Author(s): Mendonça, R.
Garrido, M. V.
Semin, G. R.
Date: 2022
Title: Two cultural processing asymmetries drive spatial attention
Journal title: Cognitive Science
Volume: 46
Number: 8
Reference: Mendonça, R., Garrido, M. V., & Semin, G. R. (2022). Two cultural processing asymmetries drive spatial attention. Cognitive Science, 46(8), e13185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13185
ISSN: 0364-0213
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1111/cogs.13185
Keywords: Spatial bias
Language script
Visual attention
Time
Eye-tracking
Abstract: Cultural routines, such as reading and writing direction (script direction), channel attention orientation. Depending on one's native language habit, attention is biased from left-to-right (LR) or from right-to-left (RL). Here, we further document this bias, as it interacts with the spatial directionality that grounds time concepts. We used a spatial cueing task to test whether script direction and the grounding of time in Portuguese (LR, Exp. 1) and Arabic (RL, Exp. 2) shape visuomotor performance in target discrimination. Temporal words (e.g., tomorrow, yesterday) were presented as cues in two modalities: visual (Exp. 1–2) and auditory (Exp. 1). Gaze movement (Exp. 1) and speed of discrimination decisions (Exp. 1–2) of targets presented to the left or right sides of the screen were assessed. As predicted, the interaction between target location and time concepts was significant across both modalities and linguistic communities. Additionally, LR participants detected the target on the right side of the screen faster after a future word than the target on the left side of the screen after a past word cue. In contrast, RL participants detected the target on the left side of the screen faster when the cue word was a future word than the target on the right side of the screen cued by a past word. In both modalities, the initial eye-gaze movement (Exp. 1) was responsive to the cue's time referent, further confirming that time orients attention. An additional bias was observed for the first fixation onset, which landed earlier on the target set that matched habitualized spatial routines. We conclude that scanning regularities are shaped by writing habits and bodily grounded categorical features.
Peerreviewed: yes
Access type: Open Access
Appears in Collections:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
article_90246.pdf575,08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.