Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27797
Author(s): | Mendonça, R. Garrido, M. V. Semin, G. R. |
Date: | 2022 |
Title: | Two cultural processing asymmetries drive spatial attention |
Journal title: | Cognitive Science |
Volume: | 46 |
Number: | 8 |
Reference: | Mendonça, R., Garrido, M. V., & Semin, G. R. (2022). Two cultural processing asymmetries drive spatial attention. Cognitive Science, 46(8), e13185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13185 |
ISSN: | 0364-0213 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.1111/cogs.13185 |
Keywords: | Spatial bias Language script Visual attention Time Eye-tracking |
Abstract: | Cultural routines, such as reading and writing direction (script direction), channel attention orientation. Depending on one's native language habit, attention is biased from left-to-right (LR) or from right-to-left (RL). Here, we further document this bias, as it interacts with the spatial directionality that grounds time concepts. We used a spatial cueing task to test whether script direction and the grounding of time in Portuguese (LR, Exp. 1) and Arabic (RL, Exp. 2) shape visuomotor performance in target discrimination. Temporal words (e.g., tomorrow, yesterday) were presented as cues in two modalities: visual (Exp. 1–2) and auditory (Exp. 1). Gaze movement (Exp. 1) and speed of discrimination decisions (Exp. 1–2) of targets presented to the left or right sides of the screen were assessed. As predicted, the interaction between target location and time concepts was significant across both modalities and linguistic communities. Additionally, LR participants detected the target on the right side of the screen faster after a future word than the target on the left side of the screen after a past word cue. In contrast, RL participants detected the target on the left side of the screen faster when the cue word was a future word than the target on the right side of the screen cued by a past word. In both modalities, the initial eye-gaze movement (Exp. 1) was responsive to the cue's time referent, further confirming that time orients attention. An additional bias was observed for the first fixation onset, which landed earlier on the target set that matched habitualized spatial routines. We conclude that scanning regularities are shaped by writing habits and bodily grounded categorical features. |
Peerreviewed: | yes |
Access type: | Open Access |
Appears in Collections: | CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
article_90246.pdf | 575,08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.