Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFreire, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKivistik, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T13:41:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-06T13:41:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier10.1590/S1981-38212013000300003en_US
dc.identifier.issn1981-3821por
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/178en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/14301en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477-
dc.description.abstractThis study is about mapping and explaining the use of the Left-Right divide across 14 countries from 5 Continents and relies on the richness of the post electoral mass surveys from the Comparative National Election Project: 14 countries and 18 elections spread over 5 continents. The paper shows not only how extensively the LR divide is used in these 14 countries, but also explains variation across both individuals and countries in terms of the factors determining LR recognition and use. Overall, it is shown that, although seen world-wide, the LR divide (both for self-placement and party placement) is more present in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and countries with freer media systems than in new democracies and societies with less free media systems. In the case of parties LR placement, party size also counts: larger parties are more easily placed. Additionally, we also show that LR recognition is more socially and politically determined in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and in countries with more freedom of the press than in new democracies and in systems with less free media system. These findings add to the existing knowledge about these topics because previous studies were either country/Continent specific, or, if global in nature, never invested in explaining individual and system variation across 14 from 5 Continents. Besides, these findings mean that in the long term probably the new democracies will converge with the long consolidated or middle-aged ones, but this is an empirical question to be researched in future studies.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherAssociação Brasileira de Ciência Políticapor
dc.rightsembargoedAccesspor
dc.subjectLeft-rightpor
dc.subjectAmericapor
dc.subjectEuropepor
dc.subjectÁfricapor
dc.subjectÁsiapor
dc.titleMapping and explaining the use of the left-right dividepor
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.pagination61-89por
dc.publicationstatusPublicadopor
dc.peerreviewedSimpor
dc.journalBrazilian Political Science Reviewpor
dc.distributionInternacionalpor
dc.volume7por
dc.number3por
degois.publication.firstPage61por
degois.publication.lastPage89por
degois.publication.issue3por
degois.publication.titleBrazilian Political Science Reviewpor
dc.date.updated2014-05-22T10:47:55Z-
Aparece nas coleções:CIES-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
publisher_version_04_BPSR_V7_n3_2013_Artigo_03.pdf
  Restricted Access
189,59 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir Request a copy


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.