Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/37353
Author(s): McCarthy, C.
Brooks, C.
Sternberg, T.
Shaney, K.
Hoshino, B.
Date: 2026
Title: AI-assisted multi-target classification for research-policy alignment in conservation science
Journal title: Ecological Informatics
Volume: 94
Reference: McCarthy, C., Brooks, C., Sternberg, T., Shaney, K., & Hoshino, B. (2026). AI-assisted multi-target classification for research-policy alignment in conservation science. Ecological Informatics, 94, Article 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103669
ISSN: 1574-9541
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103669
Keywords: Artificial intelligence
Automated classification
Conservation science
Evidence-based management
Multi-target learning
Natural language processing
Research coverage analysis
SciBERT
Abstract: Scientific research underpins effective conservation policy, yet current approaches for assessing whether scientific outputs meaningfully support defined management objectives rely primarily on manual expert review. This limitation constrains scalability, is time intensive and introduces potential bias in identifying knowledge gaps. We present a framework combining AI-assisted multi-target classification with systematic coverage analysis for automated evaluation of research alignment with conservation objectives. We compare traditional machine learning (TF-IDF + logistic regression), a generic BERT baseline, and an enhanced SciBERT approach incorporating domain-specific adaptations including multi-target architecture, balanced loss functions, and target weighting optimized for conservation science. The framework classifies research topics and conservation objective alignment, two dimensions requiring comprehension of scientific content and policy implications. We demonstrate the approach using 295 expert-annotated peer-reviewed studies from the Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area in Antarctica. Our enhanced multi-target SciBERT model achieved 70.0% macro F1, outperforming TF-IDF (59.5%) and BERT (52.0%) baselines, with per-target improvements of 21% on research topics and 14.5% on conservation objectives. The framework achieved 78% agreement with expert annotations, with particularly strong performance on conservation objective alignment (87.7% F1, 94% agreement). The integrated system successfully identified and quantified descriptive patterns in research coverage across thematic and policy dimensions, enabling systematic assessment for research prioritization and automated coverage analysis. While demonstrated in the Antarctic context, the framework architecture is broadly transferable, though successful adaptation requires retraining with domain-specific expert annotations and fine-tuning to match local management frameworks.
Peerreviewed: yes
Access type: Open Access
Appears in Collections:CEI-RI - Artigos em revista científica internacional com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
article_118409.pdf1,94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.