Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36551
Author(s): Cárdenas-Pillco, Berly
Vilca-Campana, Karla
Macedo-Medina, Vivian
Carrasco-Valencia, Lorenzo
Iruri-Ramos, Carla
Date: Mar-2026
Title: Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban rivers: The case of the Chili River in Arequipa, Peru
Journal title: CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios
Number: Spring Special Issue
Pages: 1-18
Reference: Cárdenas-Pillco, B., Vilca-Campana, K., Macedo-Medina, V., Carrasco-Valencia, L. & Iruri-Ramos, C. (2026). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban rivers: The case of the Chili River in Arequipa, Peru. CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios, (Spring Special Issue), 1-18. 10.15847/cct.40928
ISSN: 2182-3030
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.15847/cct.40928
Keywords: Cultural ecosystem services
Blue-green infrastructure
Alteração climática -- Climate change
Environmental perception
Psicologia ambiental -- Environmental psychology
Abstract: Urban rivers, as components of the blue-green infrastructure, offer diverse Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). However, their intangible nature often limits public perception and valuation. This research assessed CES perception along the Chili River in Arequipa, Peru, using surveys and participatory mapping with experts and the general population. Results indicated high valuation of scenic beauty (population: 43%; experts: 63%) and potential for research development (population: 47%; experts: 63%). Experts also emphasized cultural heritage and physical/mental health (50%). The public's primary activities were hiking (57%) and photography (30%), but a gap existed between perceived value and active participation in recreation and education. Experts highlighted tourism potential (78% strongly agree) and intangible heritage (67% strongly agree), while noting a lack of integration in environmental education (64% disagree). Mapping revealed distinct perceptions: the public identified the Intraurban section with the highest CES concentration (scenic beauty, education, heritage, knowledge, research), whereas experts emphasized the North for ecotourism (53%) and spirituality (36%), the Center for culture/landscape, and the South for research (39%) and education (28%). Water pollution (62%) and land use regulation (33%) were identified as key challenges. This study underscores the need to integrate CES into urban planning, promote community engagement, and conduct further research for the Chili River's sustainable management.
Peerreviewed: yes
Access type: Open Access
Appears in Collections:DINÂMIA'CET-RI - Artigos em revistas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
article_hdl36551.pdf1,1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.