Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/32772
Autoria: Santos, T. R.
Üzelgün, M. A.
Carvalho, A.
Data: 2024
Título próprio: Reporting on young climate activism: How journalistic multimodal choices on television can delegitimise disruptive dissent
Título da revista: Journalism Practice
Volume: N/A
Referência bibliográfica: Santos, T. R., Üzelgün, M. A., & Carvalho, A. (2024). Reporting on young climate activism: How journalistic multimodal choices on television can delegitimise disruptive dissent. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2433649
ISSN: 1751-2786
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1080/17512786.2024.2433649
Palavras-chave: Critical discourse analysis
Multimodal analysis
Television
Climate change
Youth activism
Disruptive dissent
Resumo: The effects of climate change and the significant transformations it demands will disproportionally impact young people. Recognising young climate activists as pivotal contributors to the climate debate is essential for fostering inclusive political dialogue. This study employs multimodal critical discourse analysis to examine a 17-minute reportage on young climate activism in Portugal. Our objective is to examine journalists’ role in promoting political agonism by: (1) ensuring the visibility of alternative political visions advocated by young activists, and (2) validating diverse voices and proposals for change, thereby granting them political legitimacy. Through analysing the editorial choices that foster interactions among actors, discourses and modes, such as text, image, and talk, we find that television coverage adopted a critical perspective that worked to differentiate the dutiful activist and the disruptive one. By favouring certain means of social action and by privileging the epistemic authority of certain actors, the examined reportage challenged the political legitimacy of young activists that call for deeper social changes. In doing so, it constrained discussion on alternative pathways for change and transformation, and failed to create—or indeed endorse—a comprehensive and inclusive climate debate.
Arbitragem científica: yes
Acesso: Acesso Embargado
Aparece nas coleções:CIES-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro TamanhoFormato 
article_107091.pdf
  Restricted Access
7,26 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir Request a copy


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.