Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28436
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorBiałek, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, E. A.-
dc.contributor.authorArriaga, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHarateh, D.-
dc.contributor.authorUrbanek, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T11:16:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-17T11:16:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationBiałek, M., Meyers, E. A., Arriaga, P., Harateh, D., & Urbanek, A. (2023). COVID-19 vaccine skeptics are persuaded by pro-vaccine expert consensus messaging. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Applied, 29(3), 477-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000467-
dc.identifier.issn1076-898X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/28436-
dc.description.abstractTo further understand how to combat COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, we examined the effects of pro-vaccine expert consensus messaging on lay attitudes about vaccine safety and intention to get a COVID-19 vaccine. We surveyed 729 unvaccinated individuals from four countries in the early stages of the pandemic and 472 unvaccinated individuals from two countries after 2 years of the pandemic. We found belief of vaccine safety strongly correlated with intention to vaccinate in the first sample and less strongly in the second. We also found that consensus messaging improved attitudes toward vaccination even for participants who did not believe the vaccine is safe nor intended to get it. The persuasiveness of expert consensus was unaffected by exposing participants’ lack of knowledge about vaccines. We conclude that highlighting expert consensus may be a way to increase support toward COVID-19 vaccination in those hesitant or skeptical.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCovid-19eng
dc.subjectAttitudeseng
dc.subjectExpert consensuseng
dc.subjectIllusion of explanatory deptheng
dc.subjectPersuasioneng
dc.subjectVaccinationeng
dc.titleCOVID-19 vaccine skeptics are persuaded by pro-vaccine expert consensus messagingeng
dc.typearticle-
dc.pagination477 - 488-
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.volume29-
dc.number3-
dc.date.updated2023-10-09T10:27:48Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xap0000467-
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologiapor
iscte.subject.odsSaúde de qualidadepor
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-94040-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:000943243100001-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85150758728-
iscte.journalJournal of Experimental Psychology - Applied-
Aparece nas coleções:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro TamanhoFormato 
article_94040.pdf629,89 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.