Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27963
Author(s): | Vieira, R. Azevedo, G. Oliveira, J. |
Editor: | Rocha, A., Bordel, B., Penalvo, F. G., and Gonçalves R. |
Date: | 2022 |
Title: | Using quantitative methodologies to conduct a systematic review in social sciences: Proknowk-C and Ordinatio Method in the theme “Financialization in Corporate Governance” |
Book title/volume: | 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) |
Event title: | 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI 2022 |
Reference: | Vieira, R., Azevedo, G., & Oliveira, J. (2022). Using quantitative methodologies to conduct a systematic review in social sciences: Proknowk-C and Ordinatio Method in the theme “Financialization in Corporate Governance”. In A. Rocha, B. Bordel, F. G. Penalvo, & R. Gonçalves (Eds.), 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820070 |
ISSN: | 2166-0727 |
ISBN: | 978-9-8933-3436-2 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820070 |
Keywords: | Systematic review ProKnow-C method Methodi Ordinatio |
Abstract: | The work presented here arises in the context of a larger work, which is related to the need of carrying out a survey of possible gaps in the literature on the subject of financialization within the scope of Corporate Governance, followed by a Systematic Review of the topic. Thus, using the Vos Viewer tool and two scientific methodologies, that have gained prominence in recent years - ProKnow-C Method and Ordinatio Methodi - a set of protocols based on bibliometric indexes (number of citations, age of the article and journal impact factor) was initiated in order to define the final base portfolio for the intended systematic review that would lead to the identification of gaps in the literature and thus identify possible new lines of research. The purpose of this paper is not at all to present the empirical results and gaps that the systematic review itself allowed to identify, but rather to present the methodology used for the construction of the systematic review carried out a posteriori. |
Peerreviewed: | yes |
Access type: | Open Access |
Appears in Collections: | BRU-CRI - Comunicações a conferências internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
conferenceobject_94830.pdf | 494,87 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.