Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/25272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomes, G.-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, J.-
dc.contributor.authorClaro, J.-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, F.-
dc.contributor.editorNoémia Vilela-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0212-6567-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/25272-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: According to the socioecological model teachers may act as facilitators or barriers in a school physical activity (PA) program. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize classroom teachers’ perceptions about Physical Education (PE). Methods: 297 teachers answered a questionnaire about PE past experience, status, aims, and academic benefits of PA. The Multiple Correspondence Analysis was used aiming to identify teachers’ profiles. Results: Dimension 1 combines the view that the PA affects academic achievement (AA) with the idea that PE must be optional or compulsory, but non-examinable. In dimension 2 the biggest difference is between a standard that refers to a relatively neutral position in relation to PA (PE as important for promotion of healthy lifestyles associated with the idea that PA does not affect AA, and PE should be compulsory but non-examinable), as opposed to positions, either in favour (PA benefits AA and PE should be compulsory and examinable) or against PA (PE should be optional). The joint analysis of the two dimensions allowed to identify three distinct patterns of teacher’s perceptions which made possible to build a typology, regardless the cluster they belong to. Considering their personal experience teachers make a misjudgment of PE in schools they attended specially in cluster 3. As for the relation between PA and AA, most teachers say that the PA benefits AA (65% in cluster 1; 96% in cluster 2). In cluster 3, 70% of the teachers say that PA impairs AA. Conclusions: These results support the importance of the earliest good experiences in PE, in generating positive attitudes towards PE. PE teachers should explain to other teachers that PA does not affect academic performance, and that PA prevents deviant behaviours.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FSOC%2F03126%2F2013/PT-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCluster analysiseng
dc.subjectPerceptioneng
dc.subjectPhysical activityeng
dc.subjectClassroom teacherseng
dc.titleClassroom teachers’ perception about physical education and physical activity: A typologyeng
dc.typeconferenceObject-
dc.event.typeConferênciapt
dc.event.locationViseueng
dc.event.date2016-
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.journalProceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Health Research-
dc.volume48-
degois.publication.locationViseueng
degois.publication.titleClassroom teachers’ perception about physical education and physical activity: A typologyeng
dc.date.updated2022-05-05T11:37:17Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-31535-
Appears in Collections:CIES-CRI - Comunicações a conferências internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
conferenceobject_31535pdfVersão Editora118,27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.