Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20359
Autoria: | Rosa, M. Giessner, S. R. Guerra, R. Waldzus, S. Kersting, A.- M. Velickovic, K. Collins, E. C. |
Data: | 2020 |
Título próprio: | They (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through intergroup change |
Volume: | 10 |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772 |
Palavras-chave: | Intergroup relations Intergroup change Lower-status groups Prototypicality Functional indispensability Information processing Mergers |
Resumo: | Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s= 479, 150, 266, 113 and 229 respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1-5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1-3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger-partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change. |
Arbitragem científica: | yes |
Acesso: | Acesso Aberto |
Aparece nas coleções: | CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rosa_et_al_2020_Frontiers.pdf | Versão Editora | 885,78 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.