Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16662
Author(s): | Seabra, P. Sanches, E. R. |
Date: | 2019 |
Title: | South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
ISSN: | 1384-5748 |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.1057/s41311-018-0170-0 |
Keywords: | Brasil África AGNU Relações Sul-Sul |
Abstract: | South–South relations have regained widespread interest in recent years, together with increasingly visible stances on international stages. Brazil’s interactions with the African continent, in particular, came to epitomise such a perception while sustaining an expectation of mutual alignment in several global issues. However, these assumptions still lack empirical corroboration. Drawing on United Nations General Assembly voting data for the 1991–2013 timeframe, this article questions a supposed South–South solidarity at the multilateral institution with the largest global representation and identifies key thematic axes that incite greater collective stances. The analysis further sheds light on whether or not a common South–South agenda has emerged over time. |
Peerreviewed: | yes |
Access type: | Open Access |
Appears in Collections: | CEI-RI - Artigos em revista científica internacional com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seabra-Sanches_posprint.pdf | Pós-print | 834,49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.