Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16211
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorKuba, K.-
dc.contributor.authorCapaldi, C.-
dc.contributor.authorvan Tilburg, W.-
dc.contributor.authorLipp, O. V.-
dc.contributor.authorBond, M. H.-
dc.contributor.authorVauclair, C.-M.-
dc.contributor.authorManickam, L. S. S.-
dc.contributor.authorDominguez-Espinosa, A.-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, T-
dc.contributor.authorLun, V. M.-C.-
dc.contributor.authorTeyssier, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMiles, L. K.-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, K.-
dc.contributor.authorPark, J.-
dc.contributor.authorWagner, W.-
dc.contributor.authorYu, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorXing, C.-
dc.contributor.authorWise, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSun, C.-R.-
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, R. S.-
dc.contributor.authorSalem, R.-
dc.contributor.authorRizwan, M.-
dc.contributor.authorPavlopoulos, V.-
dc.contributor.authorNader, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMaricchiolo, F.-
dc.contributor.authorMalbran, M.-
dc.contributor.authorJavangwe, G.-
dc.contributor.authorIsik, I.-
dc.contributor.authorIgbokwe, D. O.-
dc.contributor.authorHur, T.-
dc.contributor.authorHassan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFulop, M.-
dc.contributor.authorDenoux, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCenko, E.-
dc.contributor.authorChkhaidze, A.-
dc.contributor.authorShmeleva, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAntalíkova, R.-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, R. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T15:37:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-21T15:37:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0020-7594-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/16211-
dc.description.abstractInequalities between men and women are common and well-documented. Objective indexes show that men are better positioned than women in societal hierarchies—there is no single country in the world without a gender gap. In contrast, researchers have found that the women-are-wonderful effect—that women are evaluated more positively than men overall—is also common. Cross-cultural studies on gender equality reveal that the more gender egalitarian the society is, the less prevalent explicit gender stereotypes are. Yet, because self-reported gender stereotypes may differ from implicit attitudes towards each gender, we reanalysed data collected across 44 cultures, and (a) confirmed that societal gender egalitarianism reduces the women-are-wonderful effect when it is measured more implicitly (i.e. rating the personality of men and women presented in images) and (b) documented that the social perception of men benefits more from gender egalitarianism than that of women.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherPsychology Press/Taylor and Francis-
dc.relation31200788-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147229/PT-
dc.relation2011/03/N/HS6/05112-
dc.relationOTKA-K-111 789-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectCultureeng
dc.subjectSocial cognitioneng
dc.subjectGender egalitarianismeng
dc.subjectGender stereotypeseng
dc.subjectImplicit attitudeseng
dc.titleCatching up with wonderful women: the women-are-wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societieseng
dc.typearticle-
dc.event.date2018-
dc.pagination21 - 26-
dc.publicationstatusPublicadopor
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.journalInternational Journal of Psychology-
dc.distributionInternacionalpor
dc.volume53-
degois.publication.firstPage21-
degois.publication.lastPage26-
degois.publication.titleCatching up with wonderful women: the women-are-wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societieseng
dc.date.updated2019-03-08T11:55:45Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijop.12420-
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologiapor
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-36983-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:000445186000003-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85015303007-
Aparece nas coleções:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Krys et al_WOW_posprint.pdfPós-print197,51 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.