Skip navigation
Logo
User training | Reference and search service

Library catalog

Retrievo
EDS
b-on
More
resources
Content aggregators
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14709
Full metadata record
acessibilidade
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLopes, D.-
dc.contributor.authorVala, J.-
dc.contributor.authorOberlé, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T11:42:51Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-27T11:42:51Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0539-0184-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/14709-
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we analyse the moderating effect of the activation of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of heterogeneity and consensus information in the attribution of validity to group decisions. In two experimental studies, we present evidence showing that the participants, when primed with an interdependent view of the self, make no distinction between homogeneous or heterogeneous information regarding group composition while attributing validity to group decisions. Indeed, they base their validity attribution mainly on consensus information. In contrast, when primed with an independent view of the self, they make use of variability information as they attribute a greater validity to a more heterogeneous and consensual group and a lower validity to a group depicted as homogeneous and consensual. Results are discussed in light of the differential utility of consensus and heterogeneity information, as well as participants’ self-knowledge within the processes of validation of group decisions.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/115096/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147229/PT-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectConsensus informationeng
dc.subjectHeterogeneity informationeng
dc.subjectIndependenceeng
dc.subjectValidation of group decisionseng
dc.subjectInterdependenceeng
dc.titleDifferential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisionseng
dc.typearticle-
dc.pagination434 - 453-
dc.publicationstatusPublicadopor
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.journalSocial Science Information-
dc.distributionInternacionalpor
dc.volume56-
dc.number3-
degois.publication.firstPage434-
degois.publication.lastPage453-
degois.publication.issue3-
degois.publication.titleDifferential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisionseng
dc.date.updated2019-03-25T11:45:06Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0539018417714682-
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Comunicaçãopor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Outras Ciências Sociaispor
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-38045-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:000406602300006-
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85026377083-
Appears in Collections:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
acessibilidade
File Description SizeFormat 
Differential impact of independent and interdependent views.pdfPós-print838.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.