Skip navigation
Logo
User training | Reference and search service

Library catalog

Retrievo
EDS
b-on
More
resources
Content aggregators
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14644
acessibilidade
Title: Assessing executive dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders: a critical review of brief neuropsychological tools
Authors: Moreira, H. S.
Costa, A. S.
Castro, S. L.
Lima, C. F.
Vicente, S. G.
Keywords: Aging
Cognitive impairment
Executive functions
Neuropsychological assessment
Neurodegenerative disorders
Neuropsychological screening
Psychometric properties
Review
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Abstract: Executive function (EF) has been defined as a multifaceted construct that involves a variety of high-level cognitive abilities such as planning, working memory, mental flexibility, and inhibition. Being able to identify deficits in EF is important for the diagnosis and monitoring of several neurodegenerative disorders, and thus their assessment is a topic of much debate. In particular, there has been a growing interest in the development of neuropsychological screening tools that can potentially provide a reliable quick measure of EF. In this review, we critically discuss the four screening tools of EF currently available in the literature: Executive Interview-25 (EXIT 25), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), INECO Frontal Screening (IFS), and FRONTIER Executive Screen (FES). We first describe their features, and then evaluate their psychometric properties, the existing evidence on their neural correlates, and the empirical work that has been conducted in clinical populations. We conclude that the four screening tools generally present appropriate psychometric properties, and are sensitive to impairments in EF in several neurodegenerative conditions. However, more research will be needed mostly with respect to normative data and neural correlates, and to determine the extent to which these tools add specific information to the one provided by global cognition screening tests. More research directly comparing the available tools with each other will also be important to establish in which conditions each of them can be most useful.
Peer reviewed: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14644
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00369
ISSN: 1663-4365
Ciência-IUL: https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-40457
Accession number: WOS:000414930200001
Appears in Collections:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
acessibilidade
File Description SizeFormat 
fnagi-09-00369.pdfVersão Editora611.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.