Social prescription interventions: A systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorRuiz, A. P. S.
dc.contributor.authorAssis, R. V. de.
dc.contributor.authorCifuentes-Tinjaca, C. D.
dc.contributor.authorRosinha, A. P.
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-15T09:43:20Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.updated2026-07-15T10:42:33Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The increasing health disparities underscore the importance of preventive inter- ventions, where social prescription (SP) emerges as a comprehensive intervention for physical, men- tal, and social health. Objective: Identify the application procedures, types of interventions, and results of SP studied in the literature between 2019 and 2023. Materials and methods: In this systematic review, the inclusion criteria consisted of samples of adults with any medical condition, studies available in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and those describing the direct impact of an SP intervention on clients. The investigation period was from July 12 to September 1, 2023, and the databases used were Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. Results: Eight articles involving 352 participants (SD=442.648) were selected. We identified stu- dies of a qualitative (37.5%), quantitative (37.5%), and mixed (25%) nature. Qualitative studies analyzed the experiences and perceptions of clients and liaison workers regarding the SP interven- tion, while quantitative studies assessed the effects of SP on variables such as mental and physi- cal health, and social well-being. Mixed studies analyzed physical health, identification, and social belonging. We identified wide-ranging benefits, including improvements in mental and physical health, self-determination, autonomy, and social well-being. Conclusions: SP has demonstrated the potential to improve health and well-being individually and systemically, thereby increasing the efficiency of healthcare services. However, adaptation to indi- vidual needs and the effective integration of healthcare and community support are essential. The limitations suggest the need for future research addressing additional criteria.eng
dc.identifier.citationRuiz, A. P. S., Assis, R. V. de., Cifuentes-Tinjaca, C. D., & Rosinha, A. P. (2026). Social prescription interventions: A systematic literature review. Salud Uninorte, 42(2), 449-482. https://doi.org/10.14482/sun.42.02.528.657
dc.identifier.doi10.14482/sun.42.02.528.657
dc.identifier.issn0120-5552
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10071/37892
dc.language.isoeng
dc.number2
dc.pagination449 - 482
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherUniversidad del Norte
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectSocial prescriptioneng
dc.subjectInterventioneng
dc.subjectHealth organizationeng
dc.titleSocial prescription interventions: A systematic literature revieweng
dc.title.alternativeIntervenciones de prescripción social: Una revisión sistemática de la literaturaes
dc.typereview
dc.volume42
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-119174
iscte.journalSalud Uninorte
iscte.subject.odsSaúde de qualidadepor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
article_119174.pdf
Tamanho:
1023.81 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Versão Editora