The evolving study of political polarization

dc.contributor.authorErdogan, E.
dc.contributor.authorJaworsky, B. N.
dc.contributor.authorÁlvares, C.
dc.contributor.authorBodroža, B.
dc.contributor.authorButkevičienė, E.
dc.contributor.authorCela, E.
dc.contributor.authorDodeigne, J.
dc.contributor.authorFahmy, S. S.
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, S. H.
dc.contributor.authorScott, G.
dc.contributor.authorVelasco Arias, G.
dc.contributor.authorZamora Medina, R.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-25T09:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.updated2026-08-25T10:19:29Z
dc.description.abstractThe study of political polarization has undergone significant conceptual and methodological evolution, progressing from early emphases on ideological divides toward a more complex understanding that incorporates affective, identity-based, digital, and cross-national dimensions. This shift reflects the growing recognition that polarization is not merely a divergence of policy preferences, but a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by emotional, social, technological, and epistemic processes. In this review, we provide an elaboration of the various ways to approach the study of political polarization. This task may be daunting, but a well-organized, comprehensive and interdisciplinary overview is surely necessary. We begin by elaborating different types of political polarization, moving from an early focus on ideological divides to multidimensional constructs. Then, we shift to an overview of key disciplinary concepts and theoretical approaches for examining political polarization. At the heart of this review, we elaborate the various methodologies and methods for studying polarization, including quantitative, computational/digital, experimental, and qualitative approaches. We also highlight the strengths and limitations of these methodologies. To conclude the review, we first offer some suggestions for interventions that could mitigate the effects of polarization, and second, point to directions for future research. We suggest expanding the national focus that has dominated the study of polarization, highlighting the benefits of cross-national comparisons with a global reach.eng
dc.identifier.citationErdogan, E., Jaworsky, B. N., Álvares, C., Bodroža, B., Butkevičienė, E., Cela, E., Dodeigne, J., Fahmy, S. S., Schäfer, S. H., Scott, G., Velasco Arias, G., & Zamora Medina, R.(2026). The evolving study of political polarization. Open Research Europe, 6, Article 93. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.23252.1
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/openreseurope.23252.1
dc.identifier.issn2732-5121
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10071/38264
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherF1000 Research Ltd
dc.relationCA22165
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectPolarizationeng
dc.subjectMethodologyeng
dc.subjectEpistemologyeng
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Sociologiapor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticaspor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Comunicaçãopor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Outras Ciências Sociaispor
dc.titleThe evolving study of political polarizationeng
dc.typearticle
dc.volume6
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-105043745703
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:RC:166342394_S24
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-118138
iscte.journalOpen Research Europe

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
article_118138.pdf
Tamanho:
888.1 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Versão Editora