Skip navigation
Logo
User training | Reference and search service

Library catalog

Retrievo
EDS
b-on
More
resources
Content aggregators
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

acessibilidade

http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9824
acessibilidade
Title: Prospects for comparing European hospitals in terms of quality and safety: lessons from a comparative study in five countries
Authors: Burnett, S.
Renz, A.
Wiig, S.
Fernandes, A.
Weggelaar, A. M.
Calltorp, J.
Andersen J.
Robert, G.
Vincent, C.
Fulop, N.
Keywords: Measurement of quality
External quality assessment
Health-care system
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: Purpose Being able to compare hospitals in terms of quality and safety between countries is important for a number of reasons. For example, the 2011 European Union directive on patients' rights to cross-border health care places a requirement on all member states to provide patients with comparable information on health-care quality, so that they can make an informed choice. Here, we report on the feasibility of using common process and outcome indicators to compare hospitals for quality and safety in five countries (England, Portugal, The Netherlands, Sweden and Norway). Main Challenges Identified The cross-country comparison identified the following seven challenges with respect to comparing the quality of hospitals across Europe: different indicators are collected in each country; different definitions of the same indicators are used; different mandatory versus voluntary data collection requirements are in place; different types of organizations oversee data collection; different levels of aggregation of data exist (country, region and hospital); different levels of public access to data exist; and finally, hospital accreditation and licensing systems differ in each country. Conclusion Our findings indicate that if patients and policymakers are to compare the quality and safety of hospitals across Europe, then further work is urgently needed to agree the way forward. Until then, patients will not be able to make informed choices about where they receive their health care in different countries, and some governments will remain in the dark about the quality and safety of care available to their citizens as compared to that available in neighbouring countries.
Peer reviewed: Sim
URI: https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/8608
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9824
ISSN: 1353-4505
Publisher version: The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs079
Appears in Collections:BRU-RI - Artigo em revista científica internacional com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
acessibilidade
File Description SizeFormat 
publisher_version_Int_J_fro_Quality_in_Health_Care_2013.pdf110.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Currículo DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.