Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies

dc.contributor.authorEriksson, K.
dc.contributor.authorStrimling, P.
dc.contributor.authorGelfand, M.
dc.contributor.authorJunhui Wu
dc.contributor.authorAbernathy, J.
dc.contributor.authorAkotia, C. S.
dc.contributor.authorAldashev, A.
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, P. A.
dc.contributor.authorAndrighetto, G.
dc.contributor.authorAnum, A.
dc.contributor.authorArikan, G.
dc.contributor.authorTravaglino, G. A.
dc.contributor.authorTsirbas, Y.
dc.contributor.authorWan, R.
dc.contributor.authorWidodo, S.
dc.contributor.authorZein, R.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Q.-P.
dc.contributor.authorZirganou-Kazolea, L.
dc.contributor.authorVan Lange, P. A. M.
dc.contributor.authorAycan, Z.
dc.contributor.authorBagherian, F.
dc.contributor.authorBarrera, D.
dc.contributor.authorBasnight-Brown, D.
dc.contributor.authorBatkeyev, B.
dc.contributor.authorBelaus, A.
dc.contributor.authorBerezina, E.
dc.contributor.authorBjörnstjerna, M.
dc.contributor.authorBlumen, S.
dc.contributor.authorBoski, P.
dc.contributor.authorBou Zeineddine, F.
dc.contributor.authorBovina. I.
dc.contributor.authorHuyen, B. T. T.
dc.contributor.authorCardenas, J. - C.
dc.contributor.authorČekrlija, D.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, H.-S.
dc.contributor.authorContreras-Ibáñez, C. C.
dc.contributor.authorCosta-Lopes, R.
dc.contributor.authorBarra, M. De
dc.contributor.authorZoysa, P. De
dc.contributor.authorDorrough, A.
dc.contributor.authorDvoryanchikov, N.
dc.contributor.authorEller, A.
dc.contributor.authorEngelmann, J. B.
dc.contributor.authorEuh, H.
dc.contributor.authorFang, X.
dc.contributor.authorFiedler, S.
dc.contributor.authorFoster-Gimbel, O. A.
dc.contributor.authorFülöp, M.
dc.contributor.authorGardarsdottir, R. B.
dc.contributor.authorGill, C. M. H. D.
dc.contributor.authorGlöckner, A.
dc.contributor.authorGraf, S.
dc.contributor.authorGrigoryan, A.
dc.contributor.authorGritskov, V.
dc.contributor.authorGrowiec, K.
dc.contributor.authorHalama, P.
dc.contributor.authorHartanto, A.
dc.contributor.authorHopthrow, T.
dc.contributor.authorHřebíčková, M.
dc.contributor.authorIliško, D.
dc.contributor.authorImada, H.
dc.contributor.authorKapoor, H.
dc.contributor.authorKawakami, K.
dc.contributor.authorKhachatryan, N.
dc.contributor.authorKharchenko, N.
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, N.
dc.contributor.authorKiyonari, T.
dc.contributor.authorKohút, M.
dc.contributor.authorLinh Thuy Le
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, L. M.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y.
dc.contributor.authorLi, N. P.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Z.
dc.contributor.authorLiik, K.
dc.contributor.authorMaitner, A. T.
dc.contributor.authorManhique, B.
dc.contributor.authorManley, H.
dc.contributor.authorMedhioub, I.
dc.contributor.authorMentser, S.
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, L.
dc.contributor.authorNejat, P.
dc.contributor.authorNipassa, O.
dc.contributor.authorNussinson, R.
dc.contributor.authorOnyedire, N. G.
dc.contributor.authorOnyishi, I. E.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, S.
dc.contributor.authorPanagiotopoulou, P.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Floriano, L. R.
dc.contributor.authorPersson, M.
dc.contributor.authorPheko, M.
dc.contributor.authorPirttilä-Backman, A. - M.
dc.contributor.authorPogosyan, M.
dc.contributor.authorRaver, J.
dc.contributor.authorReyna, C.
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, R. B.
dc.contributor.authorRomanò, S.
dc.contributor.authorRomero, P. P.
dc.contributor.authorSakki, I.
dc.contributor.authorSan Martin, A.
dc.contributor.authorSherbaji, S.
dc.contributor.authorShimizu, H.
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, B.
dc.contributor.authorSzabo, E.
dc.contributor.authorTakemura, K.
dc.contributor.authorTieffi, H.
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, M. L. M.
dc.contributor.authorThanomkul, N.
dc.contributor.authorTiliouine, H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T11:20:18Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T11:20:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-03-19T11:19:47Z
dc.description.abstractNorm enforcement may be important for resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. However, little is known about how preferred responses to norm violations vary across cultures and across domains. In a preregistered study of 57 countries (using convenience samples of 22,863 students and non-students), we measured perceptions of the appropriateness of various responses to a violation of a cooperative norm and to atypical social behaviors. Our findings highlight both cultural universals and cultural variation. We find a universal negative relation between appropriateness ratings of norm violations and appropriateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip. Moreover, we find the country variation in the appropriateness of sanctions to be consistent across different norm violations but not across different sanctions. Specifically, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appropriate, gossip is rated as more appropriate.eng
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22378
dc.journalNature Communications
dc.language.isoeng
dc.number1
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relationP17-0030:1
dc.relationUIDB/03125/2020
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologiapor
dc.titlePerceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societieseng
dc.typearticle
dc.volume12
degois.publication.issue1
degois.publication.titlePerceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societieseng
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85102198866
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-80826
iscte.subject.odsCidades e comunidades sustentáveispor
iscte.subject.odsPaz, justiça e instituições eficazespor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
Eriksson 2021 Nature Communications.pdf
Tamanho:
1.72 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Versão Editora