They (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through intergroup change

dc.contributor.authorRosa, M.
dc.contributor.authorGiessner, S. R.
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, R.
dc.contributor.authorWaldzus, S.
dc.contributor.authorKersting, A.- M.
dc.contributor.authorVelickovic, K.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, E. C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-16T09:40:37Z
dc.date.available2020-04-16T09:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2020-04-16T10:39:38Z
dc.description.abstractIntergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations’ perspective on mergers (N’s= 479, 150, 266, 113 and 229 respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1-5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1-3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger-partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change.eng
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/20359
dc.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F89846%2F2012/PT
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subjectIntergroup relationseng
dc.subjectIntergroup changeeng
dc.subjectLower-status groupseng
dc.subjectPrototypicalityeng
dc.subjectFunctional indispensabilityeng
dc.subjectInformation processingeng
dc.subjectMergerseng
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologiapor
dc.titleThey (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through intergroup changeeng
dc.typearticle
dc.volume10
degois.publication.titleThey (don’t) need us: functional indispensability impacts perceptions of representativeness and commitment when lower-status groups go through intergroup changeeng
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85078776711
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:000509985200001
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-65747
iscte.subject.odsTrabalho digno e crescimento económicopor
iscte.subject.odsReduzir as desigualdadespor
iscte.subject.odsPaz, justiça e instituições eficazespor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
Rosa_et_al_2020_Frontiers.pdf
Tamanho:
885.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Versão Editora