Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorPennisi, F.
dc.contributor.authorLunetti, C.
dc.contributor.authorBarbati, C.
dc.contributor.authorViviani, L.
dc.contributor.authorD’Amelio, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, A. da C.
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, T.
dc.contributor.authorOdone, A.
dc.contributor.authorSignorelli, C.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-15T14:46:13Z
dc.date.available2026-04-15T14:46:13Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.updated2026-04-15T15:45:01Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: Vaccine hesitancy threatens optimal immunization coverage. This review systematically identified and evaluated interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European Region and in North America (United States and Canada). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to 17 January 2024. Eligible studies evaluated interventions targeting vaccine hesitancy. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook, and reporting adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565588). Interventions were categorized as educational, communicational, policy-based, organizational, or digital. Results: A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria. Effective approaches included multicomponent strategies, community engagement, reminder and recall systems, educational campaigns, and legislative measures. Digital interventions yielded promising but heterogeneous results. The effectiveness of interventions was often enhanced when tailored to specific population needs and local contexts. Conclusion: Multifaceted interventions adapted to the sociocultural context appear most effective in reducing vaccine hesitancy in Europe and North America. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine implementation strategies and evaluate long-term impacts.eng
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citationPennisi, F., Lunetti, C., Barbati, C., Viviani, L., D’Amelio, A. C., Pereira, A. da C., Correia, T., Odone, A., & Signorelli, C. (2026). Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review. Public Health Reviews, 47, Article 1609375. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609375
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/phrs.2026.1609375
dc.identifier.issn2107-6952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/36911
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation10113327
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subjectCanadaeng
dc.subjectHealth communicationeng
dc.subjectImmunization programseng
dc.subjectSystematic revieweng
dc.subjectUnited Stateseng
dc.titleInterventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic revieweng
dc.typereview
dc.volume47
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-117843
iscte.journalPublic Health Reviews

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
article_117843.pdf
Tamanho:
3.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Versão Editora