Caught in a “bad romance”? Reconsidering the negative association between sociosexuality and relationship functioning

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, D.
dc.contributor.authorLopes, D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, C. V.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T18:10:50Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T18:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.updated2019-04-05T12:55:35Z
dc.description.abstractSociosexuality refers to individual differences in interest and willingness to engage in sexual activity without an emotional connection. Unrestricted sociosexuality is associated with a greater likelihood of infidelity and with poorer relationship quality. However, previous research has failed to examine relationship-specific characteristics that may moderate these findings. Two studies of romantically involved adults examined whether relationship commitment and different relationship agreement types moderate the associations between unrestricted sociosexuality and infidelity. Study 1 (N = 300) showed that individuals in consensual monogamous (CM) relationships with extradyadic sex (EDS) experiences were more sociosexually unrestricted than individuals without such experiences. The positive association between unrestricted sociosexuality and EDS emerged only for less, but not more, committed individuals. Study 2 (N = 270) replicated these results. Furthermore, results showed that individuals in consensual nonmonogamous relationships (CNM) relationships were the most sociosexually unrestricted, but no differences emerged in relationship commitment or satisfaction, when compared to individuals in CM relationships without prior EDS. Individuals in CM relationship with prior EDS were the least committed and satisfied. The negative association between unrestricted sociosexuality and both relationship quality indicators emerged for all individuals in CM relationships, but it was nonsignificant for individuals in CNM relationships. Implications are discussed.eng
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.event.date2019
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00224499.2016.1252308
dc.identifier.issn0022-4499
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/17068
dc.journalJournal of Sex Research
dc.language.isoeng
dc.number9
dc.pagination1118 - 1127
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherRoutledge/Taylor and Francis
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F73528%2F2010/PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147229/PT
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Médicas::Medicina Básicapor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Outras Ciências Sociaispor
dc.titleCaught in a “bad romance”? Reconsidering the negative association between sociosexuality and relationship functioningeng
dc.typearticle
dc.volume54
degois.publication.firstPage1118
degois.publication.issue9
degois.publication.lastPage1127
degois.publication.titleCaught in a “bad romance”? Reconsidering the negative association between sociosexuality and relationship functioningeng
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.scopus2-s2.0-85001055595
iscte.alternateIdentifiers.wosWOS:000414851700005
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-31200

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
rodriguesetal2017_jsr.pdf
Tamanho:
449.5 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Pós-print