China’s role in the EU’s discursive ‘spatialization’ of Africa: A critical geopolitical approach

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, I. M.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, R.
dc.contributor.editorYichao Li
dc.contributor.editorFrancisco José B. S. Leandro
dc.contributor.editorJorge Tavares da Silva
dc.contributor.editorCarlos Rodrigues
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-31T10:29:46Z
dc.date.embargo2027-01-09
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2025-01-31T10:28:50Z
dc.description.abstractStemming from the structural implications that global normative geopolitical shifts represent for our societies, literature on the intersection between History, Geopolitics, and Discourse grew under Critical Geopolitics (CrG). This hybrid sub-disciplinary field is gaining interest for its approach to deconstructing and critiquing the ‘spatialization’ of international politics and of the normative character of competing geopolitical imaginations (Ó’Tuathail & Agnew, 1992). Recent case studies include China (Gonzalez-Vicente, 2021), Asia-Pacific (Zeng & Zhang, 2021), Russia (Omelicheva, 2016), even outer space (Klinger, 2021). And while a lot has been written about EU-China relations (Geeraerts, 2013; Levy & Révész, 2021), EU-Africa relations (Haastrup, 2013; Haastrup et al., 2021), and China-Africa relations (Xing & Farah, 2016; Kalu, 2021), there is a topic warranting further research: how the EU has reacted to China’s presence and influence in one of its (if not the) most important foreign policy regions? Against this backdrop, the proposed research aims to address this knowledge gap by studying how the EU’s discursive ‘spatialization’ of Africa as its area of responsibility in the fields of security and development factors in China’s growing interests and presence therein, which are substantially normatively different than those of the EU. In order to do so, a CrG-based empirical study is proposed, based on the triangulation of critical discourse analysis and document analysis of corpora, as well as scientific literature. The chapter is expected to contribute to the deepening of the knowledge of an area in EU-China relations that may appear marginal, but is, in fact, crucial for the projection of each actor’s foreign policy interests and identity. The chapter also contributes to furthering the debate on CrG, and its primary focus on the EU’s perspective leaves room for future research focusing on China’s viewpoint.eng
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.event.locationSingaporeeng
dc.identifier.citationRibeiro, I.M., & Pereira, R. (2024). China’s role in the EU’s discursive ‘spatialization’ of Africa: A critical geopolitical approach. In Y. Li, F. J. B. S. Leandro, J. T. Silva, & C. Rodrigues (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook on China-Europe-Africa relations (pp. 233-250). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5640-7_11
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-97-5640-7_11
dc.identifier.isbn978-981-97-5640-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/33248
dc.language.isoeng
dc.pagination233 - 250
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan
dc.relation.ispartofThe Palgrave handbook on China-Europe-Africa relations
dc.rightsembargoed access
dc.subjectEU-China relationseng
dc.subjectCritical geopoliticseng
dc.subjectActornesseng
dc.subjectEU-Africa relationseng
dc.subjectSecurity development nexuseng
dc.subjectSpatializationeng
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticaspor
dc.titleChina’s role in the EU’s discursive ‘spatialization’ of Africa: A critical geopolitical approacheng
dc.typebookPart
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-108038
iscte.subject.odsPaz, justiça e instituições eficazespor

Ficheiros