Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8331
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorDavcik, N.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-16T13:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-16T13:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0972-7981por
dc.identifier.urihttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/18583-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/8331-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The research practice in management research is dominantly based on structural equation modeling (SEM), but almost exclusively, and often misguidedly, on covariance-based SEM. The purpose of this paper is to question the current research myopia in management research, because the paper adumbrates theoretical foundations and guidance for the two SEM streams: covariance-based and variance-based SEM; and improves the conceptual knowledge by comparing the most important procedures and elements in the SEM study, using different theoretical criteria. Design/methodology/approach – The study thoroughly analyzes, reviews and presents two streams using common methodological background. The conceptual framework discusses the two streams by analysis of theory, measurement model specification, sample and goodness-of-fit. Findings – The paper identifies and discusses the use and misuse of covariance-based and variance-based SEM utilizing common topics such as: first, theory (theory background, relation to theory and research orientation); second, measurement model specification (type of latent construct, type of study, reliability measures, etc.); third, sample (sample size and data distribution assumption); and fourth, goodness-of-fit (measurement of the model fit and residual co/variance). Originality/value – The paper questions the usefulness of Cronbach's α research paradigm and discusses alternatives that are well established in social science, but not well known in the management research community. The author presents short research illustration in which analyzes the four recently published papers using common methodological background. The paper concludes with discussion of some open questions in management research practice that remain under-investigated and unutilized.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectStructural equation modelingpor
dc.subjectModelingpor
dc.titleThe use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: a review and critiquepor
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.pagination47-81por
dc.publicationstatusPublicadopor
dc.peerreviewedSimpor
dc.relation.publisherversionThe definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2013-0043por
dc.journalJournal of Advances in Management Researchpor
dc.distributionInternacionalpor
dc.volume11por
dc.number1por
degois.publication.firstPage47por
degois.publication.lastPage81por
degois.publication.issue1por
degois.publication.titleJournal of Advances in Management Researchpor
dc.date.updated2015-01-16T13:22:47Z-
Aparece nas coleções:BRU-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
post_print_JAMR_07_2013_0043_pdf592,18 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.