Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31651
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorOshiro, B.-
dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, W. H. B.-
dc.contributor.authorLuong, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorFindor, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKuzminska, A. O.-
dc.contributor.authorLantian, A.-
dc.contributor.authorÖzdoğru, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorAczel, B.-
dc.contributor.authorDinić, B. M.-
dc.contributor.authorChartier, C. R.-
dc.contributor.authorHidding, J.-
dc.contributor.authorde Grefte, J. A. M.-
dc.contributor.authorProtzko, J.-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, M.-
dc.contributor.authorPrimbs, M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorColes, N. A.-
dc.contributor.authorArriaga, P.-
dc.contributor.authorForscher, P. S.-
dc.contributor.authorLewis, S. C.-
dc.contributor.authorNagy, T.-
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, W. C.-
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Leal, W.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorFlake, J. K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-03T09:54:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-03T09:54:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationOshiro, B., McAuliffe, W. H. B., Luong, R., Santos, A. C., Findor, A., Kuzminska, A. O., Lantian, A., Özdoğru, A. A., Aczel, B., Dinić, B. M., Chartier, C. R., Hidding, J., de Grefte, J. A. M., Protzko, J., Shaw, M., Primbs, M. A., Coles, N. A., Arriaga, P., Forscher, P. S., . . . Flake, J. K. (2024). Structural validity evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale across 15 languages. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 5(1), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000061-
dc.identifier.issn2698-1866-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/31651-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) recently completed a large-scale moral psychology study using translated versions of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS). However, the translated versions have no validity evidence. Objective: The study investigated the structural validity evidence of the OUS across 15 translated versions and produced version-specific validity reports. Methods: We analyzed OUS data from the PSA, which was collected internationally on a centralized online questionnaire. We also collected qualitative feedback from experts for each translated version. Results: For each version, we produced version-specific psychometric reports which include the following: (1) descriptive item and demographics analyses, (2) factor structure evidence using confirmatory factor analyses, (3) measurement invariance testing across languages using multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses and alignment optimization, and (4) reliability analyses using coefficients ? and ?.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherHogrefe-
dc.relation249040, 2019-
dc.relationSSHRC 430-2021-00239-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectOxford Utilitarianism Scaleeng
dc.subjectTranslationeng
dc.subjectMeasurement invarianceeng
dc.subjectReliabilityeng
dc.subjectPsychological Science Acceleratoreng
dc.titleStructural validity evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale across 15 languageseng
dc.typearticle-
dc.pagination175 - 191-
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.volume5-
dc.number1-
dc.date.updated2024-05-03T10:49:29Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.doi10.1027/2698-1866/a000061-
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologiapor
iscte.subject.odsSaúde de qualidadepor
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-103971-
iscte.journalPsychological Test Adaptation and Development-
Aparece nas coleções:CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro TamanhoFormato 
article_103971.pdf375,84 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.