<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Repositório Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10071/422" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10071/422</id>
  <updated>2026-04-21T02:29:39Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-21T02:29:39Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Public shared places and private absent divides: Identity and space of colonial urbanism under Portuguese, French and Danish Rules: Diu, Pondicherry and Tranquebar</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36800" />
    <author>
      <name>Grancho, N.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36800</id>
    <updated>2026-04-06T09:16:26Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título próprio: Public shared places and private absent divides: Identity and space of colonial urbanism under Portuguese, French and Danish Rules: Diu, Pondicherry and Tranquebar
Autoria: Grancho, N.
Editor: Burns, Emily C.; Price, Alice M. Rudy
Resumo: Architecture, urbanism, and empire need a theoretical framework grounded in decolonization, informed by post-colonial, critical race, and feminist theories and critically engaged with the materiality of artworks, physical manifestations of imperialism, and sustainability. This capacious method enables a more nuanced and complex understanding of the historical imbrication of architecture, urbanism, and empire by addressing the colonial legacies of empire in architecture and urbanism with a constantly evolving process of skills acquisition to be clustered and reconfigured in response to the question dependent on language, fieldwork, and the range of architecture and cities considered. This chapter tests this model with a case study of three non-British cities in India, built by other European empires with interests in all of Asia.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Social movements</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36580" />
    <author>
      <name>Crowley, D.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Marat-Mendes, T.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Falanga, R.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36580</id>
    <updated>2026-03-10T09:24:51Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título próprio: Social movements
Autoria: Crowley, D.; Marat-Mendes, T.; Falanga, R.
Editor: Akenji, Lewis; Vergragt, Philip J.; Brown, Halina Szejnwald; Smith, Thomas S. J.; Wallnöfer. Laura Maria
Resumo: A social movement is a force pushing against something, while also pulling its alternative into being. Diani states that “social movements are defined as networks of informal interactions between a plurality of individuals, groups and/or organizations, engaged in political or cultural conflicts, based on shared collective identities”. For James and Van Seters, a social movement is also characterized by shared objectives: it is a community that “comes together” around a few minimal conditions, as a form of political association between persons who have at least a minimal sense of themselves as connected to others in common purpose and who come together across an extended period of time to effect social change in the name of that purpose.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36286" />
    <author>
      <name>Cuppini, N.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Pavoni, A.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Tulumello, S.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36286</id>
    <updated>2026-02-11T10:00:11Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título próprio: Introduction
Autoria: Cuppini, N.; Pavoni, A.; Tulumello, S.
Editor: Cuppini, Niccolò; Pavoni, Andrea; Tulumello, Simone</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Autorité, coopération et codétermination</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36105" />
    <author>
      <name>Lopes, H.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36105</id>
    <updated>2026-01-23T11:57:13Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título próprio: Autorité, coopération et codétermination
Autoria: Lopes, H.
Editor: Favereau, Olivier
Resumo: Bien que l’autorité soit systématiquement mentionnée dans les articles économiques&#xD;
sur la théorie de l’entreprise, le phénomène de l’autorité n’a jamais été véritablement&#xD;
défini ni analysé en économie, à l’exception de Herbert Simon (1951). “The fact that&#xD;
orders are typically obeyed is a puzzle” (Bowles, 2004: 343). Ce chapitre montre, d’une&#xD;
part, que le concept d’autorité soulève de profondes questions théoriques en économie&#xD;
de l’entreprise et, d’autre part, qu’il débouche sur des recommandations&#xD;
institutionnelles concernant le gouvernement d’entreprise qui s’inscrivent en totale&#xD;
rupture avec l’actuel mode dominant de gouvernement.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

